With the Apple-EMI announcement Monday, I was glad to finally see some end-user-friendly, corporate collaboration. As I saw it, this was the type of result that democratic systems should naturally default to - services that the collective whole of constituents jointly request.
But, for me, for me the audiophile, the part of the announcement containing numbers was the true success. Music labels have been releasing 128 kbps MP3s or AACs for years, a sampling quality so low that middle-fi systems can reveal the gaping holes. Existing music stores’ files were appeared as silk from afar but cheese cloth within reach of a pole.
However, for years I have ripped my tunes in 160 AAC, an equivalent to 192 kbps MP3. The 256 kbps sampling with the Apple-EMI announcement was actually unexpected for me, this “indistinguishable from the original” quality. I had never been given that number as “indistinguishable” in the past. In fact, since my graduate studies are pointed towards perceptual acoustics, as is the host of my academic readings, the numbers I had seen were closer to 128 or 192 kbps MP3. I was thoroughly satisfied with 160 AAC.
The conflict of my satisfaction then appears when I consider that my common audio reproduction method is either the iPod-included earbuds or simple 2.1 Logitech computer speakers that have served me for five years. Once I move into the house in July, actually even for my midway apartment from May to July, I will be using a super-fi system that I have pieced together from high school to today. And I should admit, listening to past-purchased 128 AAC iTunes Store content on that system doesn’t provoke tears.
So, today I ripped a few CDs laying around, ripping at 256 AAC, as a test. Once the PowerBook fan died down, I copied them all to the iPod and grabbed my Bose TriPort headphones. The first album to test: Evanescence’s Fallen.
Some of you may wince, but I have lately been getting nostalgic for my 3 or 4 year-old medium-to-heavy rock albums. You know, Something Corporate, Linkin Park, Chevelle, whatnot. Don’t ask me why. And I won’t ask you about that N’SYNC album you’ve refused to donate to Goodwill.
Ok, so get this. In 256 AAC form, Evanescence sounds amazing. The high frequencies are all there and Amy Lee’s vocals are truly remarkable, albeit likely processed by so many voice synths that supercomputers of the day had to be hired as mercenaries for the job. The whole album, actually, is beautiful at this quality. In actuality, I give this album three stars in my iTunes.
Next up was Diana Krall’s Live In Paris which was remarkably more real-to-life. This album is one of my favorites so I already know each and every part of the quar/quintet songs. But, this time I heard new background guitar timbre that I had never before spotted from the 160 AAC files. Really. That good.
The Apple-EMI deal is going to be huge, and one-by-one the other major labels will fall into place, too. It happened with television shows and is happening for movies, though that content is still protected with lock and key. Still, the 256 AAC portion of the announcement is big. It is important to remember, too, that playback hardware is the key for harnessing the other 128 kbps of these DRM-free tracks. The white earbuds are no good for this tier of playback, but a quality pair of earphones or a stereo receiver with two nice speakers could show you new layers and textures to the albums you love enough to purchase.
Anyways, now that I have experimented with 256 AAC - and also discovered how easy it is in iTunes to replace existing tracks with new files, without losing ratings or playback data - I am definitely, absolutely going to begin buying my DRM-free albums from iTunes. Audiophiles, let us rejoice!
Music: Something Corporate, "She Paints Me Blue"