The College of Engineering here decided that 2006-07 [engineering] freshmen must have a Tablet PC. I had analyzed this decision somewhat briefly and particularly from the financial and usability angles. At the MUG meetings, we discussed many of the ramifications of the decision within a holistic outlook and perspective. Many ideas and points were brought up that I had never considered.
So, “stuff” is hitting the fan, per se. My original entry was my attempted restraint to keep from writing a CT op-ed piece. My venting here was enough to satiate me temporarily. The next week, I ended up writing something and submitting. It never reached print. The next day there were several unnecessary letters to the editor printed and mine was clearly absent. It was obvious to me only a few days ago as to why - it was almost 500 words. Having this realization, I considered writing another one to submit. I was capable of holding myself back for approximately 3 or 4 hours before I was typing.
It was printed yesterday as the only letter to the editor (a piece from-scratch at a mere 280-or-so words, hoorah!). Yesterday morning, I was briefly interviewed by a CT editor who wanted to run a full feature on the story. I continually mentioned Nik, who was more able to answer most of the questions and who also knew more details about the situation than I did. I wasn’t sure how the story would run (maybe side column, front page) but getting this out in an official feature would be excellent for the cause.
The story is in print today. Front page. I need to respond to a few points.
First, it is necessary to congratulate Nik for his eloquence with the topic. He seems to have an immediate mastery of conversation, something that revs up gradually for me. To some of the faculty comments and statements, I should reply; these replies being with the respect of knowing the individual faculty members interviewed either through past associations or courses. I mean nothing here with contempt.
Glenda Scales mentions the “greater flexibility” in the classroom. And she’s dead-on correct. However, that “greater flexibility” will be tapped only in those two introductory courses. I am in Mechanical Engineering (as I’ve said too many times) and apart from those intro-engineering courses, I have never once taken my laptop to class or been required to have it there. And the Tablet will be used even more than this? Very unlikely. The flexibility capacity is a benefit, but why demand twelve degrees of freedom when you’re currently only incorporating three? (Those numbers are randomly selected for effect, not technical specifications).
Tom Walker mentions the “hidden agenda” behind this call for reconsideration of the Tablet requirement by commenting that all of the contact he has received are from Mac users, or VTMUG members. This is an astute observation; however, are there any Windows User’s Group clubs on campus? Dell User’s Groups? No. The only technologically savvy clubs/groups on this campus are the VTMUG, LUUG, and the Student Technology Council. The final being the one that the faculty/admin Engineering Computing Committee, Dr. Walker being a member of, ignored the advice of in deciding upon Tablets - STC members, in their formal and requested Tablet-testing submission, adamantly argued against requiring the machine for engineering students. The only reason Dr. Walker received so many emails from us, the MUG, is because we are one of the few groups who sees the calamity that could result. There is no hidden agenda.
In having discussions and communication with the LUUG and VTMUG, we are hopeful to initiate a student-faculty-administration discussion on this issue to get feedback from a wider audience than solely those directly involved. From the comments I’ve overheard today in classes, the student atmosphere seems to be against accepting this technology for their engineering education. That’s an interesting thing to note, since students are usually the first members of society to accept innovative ideas and resources.
I get the feeling this no-Tablet-requirement movement is only beginning. And rightly so.
Music: Iron & Wine, "Naked As We Came"