slide rules forgotten the more, no tears were shed
Thursday, March 30th, 2006I am in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech; it has a fine program for every area, mine being Mechanical. Since we are a school with significant involvement in sports, we have a wealth of charity gifts coming into the university from outlets in that area as well as proud (often sports-loving) alumni who give MILLIONS to the university every single year. Over time, this has had a cyclical effect for the success of the university and the quality of programs has been improved manyfold. Thus, our premiere engineering curriculum is better and better. Freshmen who get into the college have endless resources, to tell you the truth. It’s a blessing, I would say.
But I did make the limitation that the blessing was for those who got into [accepted into] the college. An excellent student won’t get turned away, but there are other reasons why one may not find themselves in upper campus.
I stopped by the Engineering Technology Showcase today. Within minutes, I had received a bit of news that left me stunned. Incoming freshmen for the 2006-07 academic year are required to have Tablet PCs. The PC requirement itself is nothing new; laptops were required some time around 2002. But tablets? I get the sneaking suspicion that something is up.
First, 75% of incoming engineering freshmen have always had Dells. That number has fluctuated but has remained consistent on average. As of the 2006-07 school year, 0% of incoming freshmen will have Dells, since that company does not currently offer a Tablet PC. Ironically enough, at the Showcase today, HP had the largest setup there; and they were conveniently solely promoting their tablets (a few desktops were opened up beside the tablets). The fact that students will now be forced to pay more for a computer architecture likely poorly-suited for their needs is baffling.
Second, the specs that the college requires are ABSURD for Tablet PCs. I did a search on Tablet PCs with 2.00 GHz Pentium M processors and only about a dozen models came up. One was an Acer, the rest were… you guessed it.. HP. Also check out the video card requirement - what current Tablet PC has a video card that size?
Third, this will finally turn the College of Engineering into something that only those with serious cash can get into. A scholarship is up for grabs that asked students to respond to a question as to why engineering undergrad candidates are decreasing. My response was that the college is increasingly isolating itself with the financial requirements to get into the program (and if you’re out of state, Godspeed, comrade) and I also mentioned that the fascinating research programs are hardly marketed. Ignoring my other essay points for the time, a Tablet PC is an expensive piece of technology as it is. Plus, you’re getting less performance per dollar in comparison to regular laptops. A lose/lose situation. The pool of students interested in restrictions like that will now begin to run dry as they look at other schools that don’t require ridiculous requirements as this. Let’s hope this isn’t a significant deterrent.
A friend of mine who recently transferred into our fine Pamplin College of Business was shocked that he was required to have a Windows XP-running laptop. He’s since used his Toshiba zero times in class and prefers his desktop when he’s back at his apartment (he was hoping to get a Mac laptop when transferring here, but Business school people told him it wouldn’t work). He has effectively spent well over one thousand dollars on a piece of machinery that provides him no advantage to other students (also, he has received no software that is Windows-only). The computer labs on this campus are incredible and open 24/7; unless the university is trying to cut back on computer expenses for the general student population by letting us foot the bill, then there is no reason to put STUPID requirements like this on students.
Also, those engineering laptops will be mandatorily used in two classes in the freshmen year, and then will never be brought to class again, since nothing else requires them. This is really bugging me. I was considering sending off a modified and dumbed-down version of this entry to the Collegiate Times (which they likely would print because they enjoy incendiary material) but then I remembered I am still being considered for that scholarship I mentioned earlier. If living in America has taught me anything, sometimes it’s best to live in bitterness beneath your oppressors because, were their inability as great as you hope, they will likely collapse before you do. Actually, I wish the college itself well, but the people making the technology decisions, well, they deserve significantly less than warm fuzzies.
This will be just another area I will have to address as an RA in the fall as freshmen engineers request mental support for “why did I have to spend so much on this piece of crap?”
Edit: I noticed there are more tablets that have 2.00 GHz processors, but still ultimately few.
More Edit: I can’t get this whole situation out of mind. The performance of AutoDesk Inventor is only ample on many of the laptops I’ve seen lately; I can’t begin to imagine the loss incurred by switching to lesser-powered tablets. Only baked goods could squelch this fire in me.